{"id":2433,"date":"2017-12-20T11:47:51","date_gmt":"2017-12-20T11:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.endcorporalpunishment.net\/?page_id=2433"},"modified":"2018-05-18T12:56:13","modified_gmt":"2018-05-18T11:56:13","slug":"bermuda","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/reports-on-every-state-and-territory\/bermuda\/","title":{"rendered":"Bermuda"},"content":{"rendered":"\n            <div class=\"separator- glacier-section\"  id=\"section-69d79b2274c3a\">\n            <div class=\"container\">\n                <section>\n                    \n<div class=\"row\">\n\t\n\n<div class=\"col-xs-12 col-sm-6 col-md-3\" style=\"background: transparent  \">\n\t<div class=\"feature-box text-center media-box \">\n    <div class=\"fbox-media\">\n                    <img decoding=\"async\" data-no-retina src=\"\/\/www.endcorporalpunishment.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/flag-antigua.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"\" height=\"\" class=\"img-responsive\" \/>\n        \t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"fbox-desc\">\n        <h2><\/h2>\n        <span class=\"subtitle\"><\/span>\n        \n    <\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<div class=\"col-xs-12 col-sm-12 col-md-9\" style=\"background: transparent  \">\n\t\n<div class=\"heading-block text-left heading-block-line\">\n\t<h2 class=\"special-heading\" >Country Report for Bermuda<\/h2>\n\t<\/div><div class=\"text-block shortcode-container\" >\n\t<p>LAST UPDATED: October 2017<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"row\">\n\t\n\n<div class=\"col-xs-12 col-sm-12\" style=\"background: transparent  \">\n\t\n<div class=\"vertical\">    <ul class=\"nav nav-tabs\" role=\"tablist\">\n                    <li class=\"active\"><a href=\"#tabs-69d79b22759fe0\" role=\"tab\" data-toggle=\"tab\"> Summary<\/a><\/li>\n                    <li ><a href=\"#tabs-69d79b22759fe1\" role=\"tab\" data-toggle=\"tab\"> Legality <\/a><\/li>\n                    <li ><a href=\"#tabs-69d79b22759fe2\" role=\"tab\" data-toggle=\"tab\"> UPR<\/a><\/li>\n                    <li ><a href=\"#tabs-69d79b22759fe3\" role=\"tab\" data-toggle=\"tab\"> Treaty bodies<\/a><\/li>\n                    <li ><a href=\"#tabs-69d79b22759fe4\" role=\"tab\" data-toggle=\"tab\"> Research<\/a><\/li>\n            <\/ul>\n\n    <div class=\"tab-content\">\n                    <div class=\"tab-pane active\" id=\"tabs-69d79b22759fe0\">\n                <h3>Summary of necessary legal reform to achieve full prohibition<\/h3><p>Prohibition is still to be achieved in the home, alternative care settings, day care and schools.<\/p><p>Article 266 of the Criminal Code 1907 confirms the right of parents, teachers and others with parental authority to use \u201creasonable\u201d force \u201cby way of correction\u201d. This provision should be repealed, and prohibition enacted of all corporal punishment by all persons with authority over children.<\/p><p><em>Alternative care settings<\/em> \u2013 Prohibition should be enacted in legislation applicable to all alternative care settings (foster care, institutions, places of safety, emergency care, etc).<\/p><p><em>Day care<\/em> \u2013 Corporal punishment should be prohibited in all early childhood care (nurseries, cr\u00e8ches, kindergartens, preschools, family centres, etc) and all day care for older children (day centres, after-school childcare, childminding, etc).<\/p><p><em>Schools<\/em> \u2013 Articles 23 and 24 of the Education Rules 2006 should be repealed and prohibition enacted in relation to all education settings, including public and private.<\/p>            <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"tab-pane \" id=\"tabs-69d79b22759fe1\">\n                <p>Note: Bermuda is a British Overseas Territory. As such, it has its own constitution and domestic laws and substantial responsibility for its internal affairs, including responsibility for the protection and promotion of human rights and a duty to ensure that local law complies with the relevant convention and court judgments and is non-discriminatory. The UK Government has responsibility for international relations, internal security, defence, good governance and the wellbeing of the people.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Current legality of corporal punishment<\/h3><h3>Home<\/h3><p>Corporal punishment is lawful in the home. Article 266 of the Criminal Code 1907 states: \u201cDomestic and school discipline. It is lawful for a parent, or a person in the place of a parent, or for a school-master or master, to use, by way of correction towards a child, pupil, or apprentice, under his care, such force as is reasonable under the circumstances.\u201d Children have limited protection from violence and abuse under other provisions in the Criminal Code 1907, the Children Act 1998 and the Domestic Violence (Protection Orders) Act 1997.<\/p><p>In its 2014 state party report to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the UK Government states that it \u201cdoes not condone any violence towards children and has clear laws to deal with it\u201d but \u201cour view is that a mild smack does not constitute violence\u201d.<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> A similar statement was made to the Human Rights Committee in 2015.<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a> The UK Government has on three occasions rejected recommendations to prohibit all corporal punishment of children made during the Universal Periodic Review of the UK (see below).<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Alternative care settings<\/h3><p>Corporal punishment is lawful in alternative care settings under the right to use force \u201cby way of correction\u201d in article 266 of the Criminal Code 1907. The Children Act 1998 governs registered children\u2019s homes, foster care, day care and residential homes and does not prohibit corporal punishment. The UK Government has stated that corporal punishment \u201cmay not be used on any child in care, whether in a children\u2019s home or foster care\u201d,<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> but this appears to be as a matter of policy rather than law.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Day care<\/h3><p>Corporal punishment is prohibited in day care centres in article 8 of the Day Care Centre Regulations 1999: \u201cDiscipline and guidance shall be consistent and based on an understanding of individual needs and development of a child, applying the following guidelines \u2013 (a) no child shall be subjected to physical punishment, humiliation, or verbal abuse\u2026.\u201d But there is no explicit prohibition of corporal punishment in other forms of day care (early childhood and for older children), where it is lawful under the right to use force \u201cby way of correction\u201d in article 266 of the Criminal Code 1907. The Children Act 1998 governs registered children\u2019s homes, foster care, day care and residential homes and does not prohibit corporal punishment.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Schools<\/h3><p>Corporal punishment is lawful in schools according to the Education Rules 2006 under the Education Act 1996. Article 23(1) states: \u201cThe principal may impose immediate registerable penalties of suspension, corporal punishment or recommendation for expulsion for acts of violence or acts related to the possession, distribution or use of any controlled drug, alcohol, tobacco, knife or weapon on school premises or while in uniform on the way to or from school.\u201d Article 24 states: \u201c(1) Corporal punishment shall not be administered except by the principal or the deputy principal. (2) Corporal punishment shall always be administered in the presence of another staff member as a witness. (3) If the principal authorizes another teacher to administer the punishment then the principal or the deputy principal must witness the punishment. (4) A child shall not receive corporal punishment except at the hands of a member of the same sex unless, in exceptional circumstances, the Chief Education Officer authorizes a female to administer corporal punishment to a male.\u201d Article 266 of the Criminal Code also applies (see under \u201cHome\u201d).<\/p><p>As at 2014, the Education Act and Regulations are being reviewed. In 2006, in the Policy and Procedures Manual for Teaching Staff, issued by the Ministry of Education in consultation with the Bermuda Union of Teachers, the Government confirmed that corporal punishment would be prohibited when the Education Act was reviewed (chapter. 16.5): \u201cIt is the stated policy of the Ministry that corporal punishment will be banned in the next revision of the Education Act. In the meantime the Ministry encourages Principals to avoid the use of corporal punishment.\u201d However, the Education (Amendment) Act 2015 did not prohibit corporal punishment.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Penal institutions<\/h3><p>Corporal punishment is unlawful as a disciplinary measure in penal institutions. The Abolition of Capital and Corporal Punishment Act 1999 repealed provisions for corporal punishment in the Prisons Act 1979, the Prison Rules 1980, the Senior Training School Rules 1951 and the Young Offenders Act 1950.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Sentence for crime<\/h3><p>Corporal punishment is explicitly prohibited as a sentence for crime in article 3 of the Abolition of Capital and Corporal Punishment Act 1999: \u201cWith effect from the date of commencement of this Act, no person shall suffer corporal punishment as a penalty that may be imposed by a court for any offence.\u201d<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> [2014], CRC\/C\/GBR\/5, Fifth state party report, annex, para. 2<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> [2014], CRC\/C\/GBR\/5, Fifth state party report, annex, para. 11<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> [n.d.], CCPR\/C\/GBR\/Q\/7\/Add.1, Advance Unedited Version, Reply to list of issues, para. 161<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Parliamentary answer to question asked by Baroness Walmsley, 19 December 2011; 27 March 2013, Reply to list of issues, para. 43.19<\/p>            <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"tab-pane \" id=\"tabs-69d79b22759fe2\">\n                <h3>Universal Periodic Review of the UK\u2019s human rights record<\/h3><p>The UK was examined in the first cycle of the Universal Periodic Review in 2008 (session 1). The following recommendations were made:<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a><\/p><p>\u201cTo consider further measures in order to address the problem of violence against children, including corporal punishment. (Italy)<\/p><p>\u201cTo reconsider its position about the continued legality of corporal punishment against children. (Sweden)<\/p><p>\u201cTo consider going beyond current legislation and to ban corporal punishment, also in the private sector and in its Overseas Territories. (France)\u201d<\/p><p>The Government rejected the recommendations, stating that it sees no need for law reform since it believes the current law is working well, parents should be allowed to discipline children and surveys show that the use of corporal punishment in childrearing has declined.<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> It accepted the recognition to consider going beyond current legislation in relation to protecting children from violence but rejected \u201cthe implication that it is failing in this regard through the application of its policy on corporal punishment\u201d.<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a><\/p><p>Examination in the second cycle of the UPR took place in 2012 (session 13). The following recommendations were made:<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a><\/p><p>\u201cReconsider its position about the continued legality of corporal punishment of children (Sweden);<\/p><p>\u201cTake measures to ensure the freedom of children from physical punishment in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Norway);<\/p><p>\u201cIntroduce a ban on all corporal punishment of children as recommended by the CRC and other treaty bodies (Finland)\u201d<\/p><p>The Government rejected the recommendations.<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a><\/p><p>The UK\u2019s third cycle examination took place in 2017 (session 27). The following recommendations were made:<a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a><\/p><p>\u201cIn all devolved administrations, overseas territories and Crown dependencies, prohibit all corporal punishment in the family, including through the repeal of all legal defences, such as \u201creasonable chastisement\u201d (Liechtenstein);<\/p><p>\u201cEnsure that corporal punishment is explicitly prohibited in all schools and educational institutions and all other institutions and forms of alternative care (Liechtenstein);<\/p><p>\u201cProhibit corporal punishment in all settings, including the family (Ireland);<\/p><p>\u201cReconsider its position on the legality of corporal punishment of children (Mongolia);<\/p><p>\u201cBan corporal punishment of children to ensure the full protection and freedom from violence for all children (Sweden);<\/p><p>\u201cConsider prohibiting corporal punishment against children and ensure that it is explicitly prohibited in all schools and educational institutions, and all other institutions and forms of alternative care (Croatia);<\/p><p>\u201cTake further actions in protecting the rights of the child by prohibiting all corporal punishment of children as required by the convention of the Rights of Child (Estonia)\u201d<\/p><p>The Government rejected all seven recommendations, stating: \u201cthe UK does not condone any violence towards children and has clear laws to deal with it. The \u2018reasonable chastisement\u2019 defence in s.58 Children Act 2004 cannot be used when someone is charged with assault causing actual or grievous bodily harm, or with child cruelty. Parents should not be criminalised for giving a child a mild smack in order to control their behaviour. The Crown Dependencies currently follow a similar approach to the UK. The decision on whether to prohibit corporal punishment and in what settings in the Overseas Territories is a decision, ultimately, for Territory governments. The UK Government is keen to support those Territories who wish to move away from the use of corporal punishment and explore alternative measures, including the development of positive parenting strategies and effective behaviour management techniques.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\"><sup>[7]<\/sup><\/a><\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> 23 May 2008, A\/HRC\/8\/25, Report of the working group, paras. 56(2), 56(3), 56(4) and 56(5)<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> 23 May 2008, A\/HRC\/8\/25, Report of the working group, para. 25<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> 25 August 2008, A\/HRC\/8\/25\/Add.1, Report of the working group: Addendum, paras. 28, 29 and 30<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> 6 July 2012, A\/HRC\/21\/9, Report of the working group, paras. 110(78), 10(79) and 110(80)<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> 17 September 2012, A\/HRC\/21\/9\/Add.1, Report of the working group: Addendum, annex<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> 8 May 2017, A\/HRC\/WG.6\/27\/L.7, Draft report of the working group, unedited version, paras. 6(193), 6(194), 6(195), 6(196), 6(197), 6(198) and 6(199)<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref7\" name=\"_ftn7\">[7]<\/a> 7 September 2017, A\/HRC\/36\/9\/Add.1, Report of the working group: addendum, para. 3; see also 29 August 2017, Annex to the response to the recommendations received on 4 May 2017<\/p>            <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"tab-pane \" id=\"tabs-69d79b22759fe3\">\n                <h3>Recommendations by human rights treaty bodies<\/h3><p>Note: According to the UK\u2019s 2014 Common Core Document<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>, the following treaties apply in Bermuda: the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the UN Convention against Torture and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The European Social Charter does not apply.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Committee on the Rights of the Child<\/h3><p>(3 June 2016, CRC\/C\/GBR\/CO\/5, Concluding observations on fifth report, para. 40)<\/p><p>\u201cWith reference to its general comment No. 8 and its previous recommendations, the Committee urges the State party, in all devolved administrations, Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, to:<\/p><p>a) prohibit as a matter of priority all corporal punishment in the family, including through the repeal of all legal defences, such as \u201creasonable chastisement\u201d;<\/p><p>b) ensure that corporal punishment is explicitly prohibited in all schools and educational institutions and all other institutions and forms of alternative care;<\/p><p>c) strengthen its efforts to promote positive and non-violent forms of discipline and respect for children\u2019s equal right to human dignity and physical integrity, with a view to eliminating the general acceptance of the use of corporal punishment in child-rearing.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Committee on the Rights of the Child<\/p><p>(20 October 2008, CRC\/C\/GBR\/CO\/4, Concluding observations on third\/fourth report, paras. 40, 41 and 42)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee, while noting amendments to legislation in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland which restrict the application of the defence of \u2018reasonable chastisement\u2019, is concerned that this defence has not been removed. The Committee welcomes the commitment of the National Assembly in Wales to prohibiting all corporal punishment in the home, but notes that under the terms of devolution it is not possible for the Assembly to enact the necessary legislation. The Committee is concerned at the failure of State party to explicitly prohibit all corporal punishment in the home and emphasizes its view that the existence of any defence in cases of corporal punishment of children does not comply with the principles and provisions of the Convention, since it would suggest that some forms of corporal punishment are acceptable.<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee is further concerned that corporal punishment is lawful in the home, schools and alternative care settings in virtually all overseas territories and crown dependencies.<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee, reiterating its previous recommendations (CRC\/C\/15\/Add.188, para. 35), in the light of its general comment No. 8 on \u2018the right of the child to protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment\u2019, as well as noting similar recommendations made by the Human Rights Committee; the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women; and the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, recommends that the State party:<\/p><p>a) prohibit as a matter of priority all corporal punishment in the family, including through the repeal of all legal defences, in England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, and in all Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies;<\/p><p>b) ensure that corporal punishment is explicitly prohibited in schools and all other institutions and forms of alternative care throughout the United Kingdom and in the overseas territories and crown dependencies;<\/p><p>c) actively promote positive and non-violent forms of discipline and respect for children\u2019s equal right to human dignity and physical integrity, with a view to raising public awareness of children\u2019s right to protection from all corporal punishment and to decreasing public acceptance of its use in childrearing;<\/p><p>d) provide parental education and professional training in positive child-rearing.\u201d<\/p><p>Committee on the Rights of the Child<\/p><p>(16 October 2000, CRC\/C\/15\/Add.135, Concluding observations on initial report on Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, paras. 35, 36, 55 and 57)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee expresses grave concern that corporal punishment is still widely practised in many of the Overseas Territories and that domestic legislation generally does not prohibit and eliminate its use in schools, care institutions and homes. It also notes with concern that the British Virgin Islands is the only remaining Territory that has not yet prohibited by law the use of judicial corporal punishment.<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee recommends that all appropriate measures, including of a legislative nature, be taken to prohibit and eliminate all forms of corporal punishment within the school, juvenile justice and alternative care systems and in the home. The Committee further suggests that awareness raising and education campaigns be conducted to change public attitudes and ensure that alternative forms of discipline are administered in a manner consistent with the child\u2019s human dignity and in conformity with the Convention, especially articles 19 and 28.2.<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee notes that legislation relating to juvenile justice has been enacted in all of the Overseas Territories. While the Committee appreciates that the legal abolition of judicial corporal punishment in most of the Overseas Territories, it is concerned that the bill to abolish it in the British Virgin Islands has not yet been enacted\u2026.<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee further recommends that the British Virgin Islands reinforce efforts to enact the bill introduced into the Legislative Council to abolish the use of judicial corporal punishment in the islands.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights<\/h3><p>(12 June 2009, E\/C.12\/GBR\/CO\/5, Concluding observations on fourth\/fifth report, para. 24)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee \u2026 also remains concerned that corporal punishment of children in the home is not yet prohibited by law.<\/p><p>The Committee \u2026 reiterates its recommendation that physical punishment of children in the home be prohibited by law.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights<\/p><p>(5 June 2002, E\/C.12\/1\/Add.79, Concluding observations on fourth report, para. 36)<\/p><p>\u201cGiven the principle of the dignity of the individual, which provides the foundation for international human rights law (see paragraph 41 of the Committee\u2019s General Comment No.13) and in the light of article 10.1 and 10.3 of the Covenant, the Committee recommends that the physical punishment of children in families be prohibited, in line with the recommendation of the Committee on the Rights of the Child (see paragraph 31 of the 1995 concluding observations of that Committee (CRC\/C\/15\/Add.34)).\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights<\/p><p>(4 December 1997, CESCR\/E\/C.12\/1\/Add.19, Concluding observations on third report, paras. 16 and 28)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee is alarmed by the fact that corporal punishment continues to be practised in schools which are privately financed, and at the statement by the delegation that the Government does not intend to eliminate this practice.<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee recommends that the State party take appropriate measures to eliminate corporal punishment in those schools in which this practice is still permitted, i.e. privately financed schools.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Committee Against Torture<\/h3><p>(24 June 2013, CAT\/C\/GBR\/CO\/5, Concluding observations on fifth report, para. 29)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee takes note of amendments to legislation in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, which limit the application of the defence of \u201creasonable punishment\u201d (or \u201cjustifiable assault\u201d in Scotland), but remains concerned that some forms of corporal punishment are still legally permissible in the home by parents and those in loco parentis. In addition, it is concerned that some forms of corporal punishment are lawful in the home, schools and alternative care settings in almost all overseas territories and Crown dependencies.<\/p><p>The Committee recommends that the State party prohibits corporal punishment of children in all settings in the Metropolitan territory, Crown dependencies and overseas territories, repealing all legal defences currently in place, and further promote positive non-violent forms of discipline via public campaigns as an alternative to corporal punishment.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Committee Against Torture<\/p><p>(17 November 1998, A\/54\/44, Concluding observations on third report, para. 74)<\/p><p>\u201cPositive aspects:<\/p><p>d) the removal of corporal punishment as a penalty in several of the Dependent Territories.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Committee Against Torture<\/p><p>(9 July 1996, A\/51\/44, Concluding observations on second report, para. 65)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee recommends that the Government of the United Kingdom take the following measures:<\/p><p>i) reconsidering corporal punishment with a view to determining if it should be abolished in those dependencies that still retain it.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Committee Against Torture<\/p><p>(26 June 1993, A\/48\/44, Concluding observations on initial report, para. 283)<\/p><p>\u201c\u2026 The territories appeared to be governed in accordance with the obligations on the Convention and the Committee congratulated the Government of the United Kingdom in this respect. The Committee was, however, interested in receiving more detail pertaining to cases of corporal punishment in the territories retaining it. The nature and incidence of such punishment, together with details of the crime and the characteristics of the offender, should be forwarded to the Committee when the information is gathered\u2026.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h3>Human Rights Committee<\/h3><p>([July 2015], CCPR\/C\/GBR\/CO\/7 Advance Unedited Version, Concluding observations on seventh report, para. 20)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee remains concerned that corporal punishment is still not fully outlawed in the home and certain educational and alternative care facilities in the United Kingdom and in almost all British Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories. It is further concerned about the lack of explicit prohibition of corporal punishment in the home and the existing legal defences of \u2018reasonable punishment\u2019 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland or \u2018justifiable assault\u2019 in Scotland (arts. 7 and 24).<\/p><p>The State party should take practical steps,\u00a0including through legislative measures where appropriate, to put an end to corporal punishment in all settings, including the home, throughout United Kingdom and all Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories, and repeal all existing legal defences across the State party\u2019s jurisdiction. It should encourage non-violent forms of discipline as alternatives to corporal punishment, and conduct public information campaigns to raise awareness about its harmful effects.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Human Rights Committee<\/p><p>(30 July 2008, CCPR\/C\/GBR\/CO\/6, Concluding observations on sixth report, para. 27)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee notes with concern that corporal punishment of children is not prohibited in schools in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat and the Crown Dependencies. (arts. 7 and 24)<\/p><p>The State party should expressly prohibit corporal punishment of children in all schools in all British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies.\u201d<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Human Rights Committee<\/p><p>(27 July 1995, CCPR\/C\/79\/Add.55, Concluding observations on fourth report, para. 8)<\/p><p>\u201cThe Committee recommends that corporal punishment administered to privately funded pupils in independent schools be abolished.\u201d<\/p><p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/418207\/human-rights-common-core-document.pdf\">https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/418207\/human-rights-common-core-document.pdf<\/a>, accessed 19 June 2017<\/p>            <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"tab-pane \" id=\"tabs-69d79b22759fe4\">\n                <h3>Prevalence\/attitudinal research in the last ten years<\/h3><p>None identified.<\/p>            <\/div>\n            <\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n                <\/section>\n            <\/div>\n                    <\/div>\n    \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Country Report for Bermuda LAST UPDATED: October 2017 Summary Legality UPR Treaty bodies Research Summary of necessary legal reform to achieve full prohibitionProhibition is still to be achieved in the home, alternative care settings, day care and schools.Article 266 of the Criminal Code 1907 confirms the right of parents, teachers and others with parental authority [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":1301,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2433","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2433"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6195,"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2433\/revisions\/6195"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1301"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/endcorporalpunishment.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}